Efficacy of soap and water and alcohol-based hand-rub preparations against live H1N1 influenza virus on the hands of human volunteers.

Clin Infect Dis 2009,Feb,01;48(3):285-91; (PMID: 19115974)
Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Grayson, M Lindsay ; Melvani, Sharmila ; Druce, Julian ; Barr, Ian G ; Ballard, Susan A ; Johnson, Paul D R ; Mastorakos, Tasoula ; Birch, Christopher;

Infectious Diseases Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia. Lindsay.Grayson@austin.org.au

article abstract

BACKGROUND: Although pandemic and avian influenza are known to be transmitted via human hands, there are minimal data regarding the effectiveness of routine hand hygiene (HH) protocols against pandemic and avian influenza. METHODS: Twenty vaccinated, antibody-positive health care workers had their hands contaminated with 1 mL of 10(7) tissue culture infectious dose (TCID)(50)/0.1 mL live human influenza A virus (H1N1; A/New Caledonia/20/99) before undertaking 1 of 5 HH protocols (no HH [control], soap and water hand washing [SW], or use of 1 of 3 alcohol-based hand rubs [61.5% ethanol gel, 70% ethanol plus 0.5% chlorhexidine solution, or 70% isopropanol plus 0.5% chlorhexidine solution]). H1N1 concentrations were assessed before and after each intervention by viral culture and real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The natural viability of H1N1 on hands for >60 min without HH was also assessed. RESULTS: There was an immediate reduction in culture-detectable and PCR-detectable H1N1 after brief cutaneous air drying--14 of 20 health care workers had H1N1 detected by means of culture (mean reduction, 10(3-4) TCID(50)/0.1 mL), whereas 6 of 20 had no viable H1N1 recovered; all 20 health care workers had similar changes in PCR test results. Marked antiviral efficacy was noted for all 4 HH protocols, on the basis of culture results (14 of 14 had no culturable H1N1; (P< .002) and PCR results (P< .001; cycle threshold value range, 33.3-39.4), with SW statistically superior (P< .001) to all 3 alcohol-based hand rubs, although the actual difference was only 1-100 virus copies/microL. There was minimal reduction in H1N1 after 60 min without HH. CONCLUSIONS: HH with SW or alcohol-based hand rub is highly effective in reducing influenza A virus on human hands, although SW is the most effective intervention. Appropriate HH may be an important public health initiative to reduce pandemic and avian influenza transmission.

Mesh Terms

Alcohols
Disinfectants
Hand
Human Experimentation
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype

Your new biomedical search engine	try: asthma , trastuzumab , BRCA1 , Collins, F	Advanced Search Preferences
	Search in: U.S. Grants Pubmed Free Full Text

Connotea		Delicious
Diigo		Send by email
Twitter		CiteULike

Create Label
Name of label:
Please introduce a name for the label.
A label with this name exists already.

Your new biomedical search engine

Key concepts

Efficacy of soap and water and alcohol-based hand-rub preparations against live H1N1 influenza virus on the hands of human volunteers.

Grayson, M Lindsay ; Melvani, Sharmila ; Druce, Julian ; Barr, Ian G ; Ballard, Susan A ; Johnson, Paul D R ; Mastorakos, Tasoula ; Birch, Christopher;

article abstract

Mesh Terms

cited by

STOPFLU: is it possible to reduce the number of days off in office work by improved hand-hygiene?.

Effectiveness of Common Household Cleaning Agents in Reducing the Viability of Human Influenza A/H1N1.

Early Assessment of Anxiety and Behavioral Response to Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A(H1N1).

Your search contains date ranges. It can be saved but no alerts can be created. To create an alert please repeat the search without date ranges.


Your search has been saved.
Do you want to create an email alert?

myns_savedsearch.alertcreated

The entity has already been added to the filters

This article will be available in PMC on .